<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Maeda is wrong about design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philvanallen.com/news/john-maeda-is-wrong-about-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philvanallen.com/news/john-maeda-is-wrong-about-design/</link>
	<description>interactive designer, educator, photographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:26:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Afterword &#171; Modeless and Modal</title>
		<link>http://www.philvanallen.com/news/john-maeda-is-wrong-about-design/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Afterword &#171; Modeless and Modal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philvanallen.com/?p=304#comment-871</guid>
		<description>[...] 最後に、さっき浅野さんに教わった記事から、かっこいい言葉を引用しておきます。 In particular, if we think about Interactive Design, the highest goal should be to empower people to create their own meaning spaces, not solve pre-determined problems or even make great experiences. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 最後に、さっき浅野さんに教わった記事から、かっこいい言葉を引用しておきます。 In particular, if we think about Interactive Design, the highest goal should be to empower people to create their own meaning spaces, not solve pre-determined problems or even make great experiences. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph S</title>
		<link>http://www.philvanallen.com/news/john-maeda-is-wrong-about-design/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philvanallen.com/?p=304#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this thought.
And yes. If Designers would only solve problems, designers would jump into the same as engineers. Or am i wrong? I think it is not so very simple but if i personaly look on development processes design is different than engineering,(simple) and design comes a bit before engineering in developing phase, with an overlap. And i do not talk about research. There engineering and design can live in parallel. But in development desing can show solutions but also raising a lot of questions or even just finding the important questions, reframing them so that others can go to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this thought.<br />
And yes. If Designers would only solve problems, designers would jump into the same as engineers. Or am i wrong? I think it is not so very simple but if i personaly look on development processes design is different than engineering,(simple) and design comes a bit before engineering in developing phase, with an overlap. And i do not talk about research. There engineering and design can live in parallel. But in development desing can show solutions but also raising a lot of questions or even just finding the important questions, reframing them so that others can go to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.339 seconds -->
